Oral History Interview with
Seventeen year veteran with the Associated Press. Later news editor and acting managing editor of the Providence (Rhode Island) Journal-Bulletin, after which he served in the White House as liaison for the press-radio division of the Office of Inter-American Affairs. In January, 1945, he became part of the White House staff as a press officer until he retired at the end of the Truman administration.
Eben A. Ayers
June 30, 1970
Jerry N. Hess
[Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | Additional Ayers Oral History Transcripts | List of Subjects Discussed]
This is a transcript of a tape-recorded interview conducted for the Harry S. Truman Library. A draft of this transcript was edited by the interviewee but only minor emendations were made; therefore, the reader should remember that this is essentially a transcript of the spoken, rather than the written word.
Numbers appearing in square brackets (ex. ) within the transcript indicate the pagination in the original, hardcopy version of the oral history interview.
This oral history transcript may be read, quoted from, cited, and reproduced for purposes of research. It may not be published in full except by permission of the Harry S. Truman Library.
Opened August, 1972
Harry S. Truman Library
[Notices and Restrictions | Interview Transcript | Additional Ayers Oral History Transcripts | List of Subjects Discussed | Top of the Page]
Oral History Interview with
June 30, 1970
Jerry N. Hess
HESS: All right, to start with today, Mr. Ayers, in your opinion, just how successful was Mr. Truman in ability to separate his individual views from the views he thought he should take because he was President?
AYERS: That's a very difficult thing to answer fairly and accurately. You're speaking particularly, I think, of civil rights. That was the question most likely to...
HESS: That's the question usually raised in this context. When Mr. Truman would make a liberal pronouncement on civil rights, or when he supported the report of October l947, the one entitled To Secure These Rights, was he actually as liberal and as forward-thinking in matters of civil rights as it would appear from his pronouncements and from the report?
AYERS: Again, I say I think that such a question calls for one person's opinion only, because I don't think anybody knows exactly. But my own opinion is that he believed in what he advocated, because it was right. He might not have been as deeply affected inside as some of the other people were because of his background. His mother was an unreconstructed southerner, and he undoubtedly had
been influenced in his lifetime by her, and family, and his residence and all that, and it may have been quite a step for him to take. But I think he took it because he thought that the time had come for these things to be done and that they were the right things. Now that isn't a very good answer, perhaps, but it's as good as I can give.
I think he believed in those things just as a lot of people today, that you and I know, believe in these things but find it hard sometimes when it comes close to home, to go out a hundred percent. He did I think. He went farther than probably people in his area would have expected him to. I don't know; that's just supposition on my part because I don't come from that part of the country, and I don't know exactly how people thought, but I can guess how some did.
HESS: All right, one other question that we have to cover either today or some time in the future, is about Mr. Truman's relationship with Robert Hannegan. Have any comments on that today?
AYERS: I don't think so. I think that I have probably in my notes somewhere, some things about it, fleeting things perhaps, but I think Mr. Truman's relationship with him was fairly close, politically, because Hannegan
had a hand in his nomination for Vice President. He was out in Chicago and had quite a hand in it, as you know, and as the records show. But I think that perhaps the time came after his appointment as Postmaster General when he went a little farther in taking advantage of that relationship than some of the people, if not the President himself, thought he should. He thought he was going to have the run of the White House I think. At least he showed up--I know he showed up for--well, I don't know whether for more than one or two or not, but one or two staff meetings in the morning, and that didn't set too well.
HESS: Do you recall who objected?
AYERS: No I don't recall offhand. I might, somewhere in my notes somewhere, might have had something about that, but I don't know how fully I ever went into it; not very deeply probably. I know that it suddenly stopped. He didn't come for very long, very often, after that.
HESS: Were there other Cabinet members who wanted to come sit in on the staff meetings?
AYERS: Not to my knowledge.
HESS: All right. And during the latter part of the Truman administration was a period that is also known as the period of McCarthyism, when Senator Joseph McCarthy was
making many of his accusations about communism. Did that cause the--did you feel that that caused the members of the White House staff to be extra cautious in some of their actions?
AYERS: I don't know of any. The only one that I recall at all, who was affected directly, was Philleo Nash. I think that McCarthy did make some crack about Philleo at one time which nobody in the White House believed, and if there was any feeling in the White House it was one against McCarthy, strengthened against McCarthy because of that. I never thought anything about McCarthy, from a personal standpoint, and I don't know of anybody in the White House who did, other than Philleo, and I don't think I ever mentioned it to Philleo, and whether any of them took any special precautions to see that they weren't plastered with the mud--I don't know.
HESS: David Lloyd was also on one of Mr. McCarthy's lists. I believe . .
AYERS: Oh, he was? I forgot.
HESS: Do you recall that?
AYERS: No, I didn't recall that. I'm not surprised. Anybody that--anybody I suppose that might have been called a liberal was likely to be on the McCarthy list at that time. I personally never met Mr. McCarthy except once.
HESS: What was the occasion?
AYERS: Well, that was a very brief meeting. I think it was prior to a dinner by the Womens' National Press Club or something like that--one of the women's newspaper group's dinners. And my wife and I were there and we were invited by some of the girls to one of the numerous cocktail parties that were held before the dinner in the hotel, and at one that we went to, there was McCarthy, and somebody introduced us. That was before McCarthy had created McCarthyism--you know what I mean.
AYERS: And I remember talking to him briefly, my wife and I. Got to talking about cheese. He was boasting about Wisconsin cheese .
HESS: Wisconsin cheese.
AYERS: And we stood up for the old northern New York cheese. Northern New York, and our hometown was the center, it was the greatest inland cheese market in the world at one time. And so we had a little friendly discussion. He was going to send us some Wisconsin cheese, which he never did.
That was my only direct contact with Mr. McCarthy and that was enough.
HESS: All right, getting right up to the next to the last day that Mr. Truman was in the White House, have you ever heard of the situation in which the President may have
been at the Blair House on January the 19th, 1953, this was the night before General Eisenhower's inauguration, in which there was a gathering of people and at which Mr. Truman may have said that what he would be remembered for and what his administration would be remembered for, would not be the Marshall plan or point 4, but would be for reorganizing the White House office in such a manner that no future President could make a mistake. Did you ever hear anything like that?
AYERS: No, I don't think I ever did.
HESS: Did you attend any parties or cocktail parties the night before the inauguration? Do you recall?
AYERS: I don't think so. I don't recall any. I wasn't at that one. I'm sure I wasn't.
HESS: This is one that we're not even sure took place, but it's just something that we have heard, that we're trying to trace down.
AYERS: I don't recall it and I don't find any reference to it in my notes, although it may have taken place without my knowledge. The President did give a dinner on the night of December 18th for the members of his staff. Possibly that may have been the affair of which you had some report or rumor. The guests at this dinner included not only the members of his staff at that time, but some
who had been with him in earlier years and had left.
There were about forty present and it was quite an informal affair. I may have more somewhere in my accumulation of notes and papers but now I have no actual recollection whatever of the affair and no idea just who attended.
HESS: Okay. What do you recall about Mr. Truman's interest in books and his reading tastes?
AYERS: Well, I have a little note or two here somewhere; somebody I think had asked him about that, on one of our trips. It was during a little trip on the Williamsburg back in, oh, I guess l946, and someone asked what books he found the most valuable or interesting in his life, something like that. And he said, "History, the old Greeks, and other satirists, and so forth;" Mark Twain, whose writings he had read extensively.
And then there was--there had been, in fact, a month or so before that, a little incident that's rather interesting I think. He was down the river, on the Williamsburg, just a little cruise, and Charlie Ross was along. It seems, as I recall, that the President had told the newspapermen--or Ross told the newspapermen--that the President had been reading a biography of Grover Cleveland, but he couldn't recall
the name of the author, and the book had been left behind. And I got a telephone call from the ship from Charlie Ross and he asked me if I could see if I could find the book.
Well, I went over to the house--there was nobody there, the family wasn't there--and I got one of the house servants, and we went up to the President's room and into the bedroom, where there were a lot of books around, several on the bed. And we handled them over, and I came onto Allan Nevins' biography of Grover Cleveland. I think the title of it was, A Study in Courage. I don't know whether Ross called me the next day about it or not, but I got the book anyway that night and took it over and arranged to send it down to the ship. I never heard any more about it. I don't know whether Ross ever mentioned it again or I did, or forgot all about it. But I thought it was rather interesting. He was always interested in historical biographies, biographies of historical personages, and in history itself. And he was darned well informed. I suppose that there are other books that had been mentioned at one time or another, such as the Bible, which I think he said he had read through a couple of times.
HESS: What do you recall about the transition from the
Truman administration to the Eisenhower administration?
AYERS: Well, the things that I recall are not of great moment, to tell the truth. I don't think anybody around the White House offices was too comfortable in the brief period while that was taking place.
HESS: Was Sherman Adams in evidence, did you see him around?
AYERS: I don't know whether he was or not. I don't recall. I don't believe that I had heard much, if anything, of him before the actual inauguration of Eisenhower and the departure of President Truman on January 20th. I had a note dated January 23rd, in which I said there was every evidence that "Sherman Adams, former Governor of New Hampshire, assistant to the President" was to be the top man and that he "was attempting to run everything in the White House and, perhaps, in much of the new administration." I wrote that it was doubtful to many of us that this was possible and "it seems not unlikely that he is riding for a fall."
Through this period, both before and after the inauguration, I did not get into the West Wing offices overly much, but even before Eisenhower took office, some of his people showed up and it was obvious that they were feeling their oats pretty much and some of them acted even then as if they had already taken over.
HESS: Anybody in particular that you recall?
AYERS: There were two or three who come to mind: for instance, Jim [James C.] Hagerty, who was coming in as presidential press secretary, and a Roger Steffan, an assistant to Adams, who was given the title--officially or unofficially--of "Director of Operations." Hagerty, a former newspaperman, had served as press secretary to Governor Dewey at Albany. Steffan had also been a newspaperman at some time in his earlier career but after he came into the White House he became known as "hatchet man" for Sherman Adams. One, if not his principal job, was firing people, some of which was done pretty brutally, as in the case of Miss [Louise L.] Hachmeister, who was the chief telephone operator, and a very able and useful person. She had been in the job since Roosevelt days and knew everyone, and was highly thought of by everyone.
There was a story about President Truman and Steffan that was told me shortly after Truman had left office and the Eisenhower people had taken over. It was told me by a White House usher, now long gone, who said it came from Mrs. Truman. According to this story, President Truman encountered Steffan in the White House offices a few days before the inauguration, pointed his finger at Steffan and told him that he
was there only on sufferance and that if he did any thing to any of the Truman people he would throw him out. Then, as he walked away and within Steffan's hearing--according to the story as told me--Truman said he wished Steffan would say or do something as he would like to take a crack at him.
HESS: Did you ever see Eisenhower during the month that you were there after he was inaugurated on January 20th?
AYERS: I don't think I ever saw him during that month that I was there.
My office at that time was in the old State, War and Navy Building (now the Executive Office Building), but I did get into the White House Wing (the office wing) frequently and I knew something of what was going on. One of the interesting stories I was told dealt with Eisenhower's arrival at the White House as President. It was told me by a White House employee on my own last day there, February 27th.
He said that after his inauguration, Eisenhower did not get into the White House as President and as the new occupant of the House, until about 7 o'clock that evening. After his inauguration, he returned from the Capitol to the reviewing stand on Pennsylvania Avenue, in front of the White House grounds, for the
inaugural parade but he did not go into the House until the end of the parade.
During the afternoon a couple of sealed envelopes, marked "Confidential and Secret," for Eisenhower had been delivered and Howell Crim, chief usher, accepted them and signed for them. After Eisenhower came into the House he was taken upstairs to the private, family quarters and Crim got the two envelopes and took them to him.
Eisenhower, the narrator told me, turned on Crim, and said, "Never bring me a sealed envelope; that's what I've got aides for." He told Crim to deliver any such communications to the aides and if he could not find them, to open them himself and decide what should be done and whether Eisenhower should see them.
HESS: President Eisenhower thought the chief usher should have opened it, is that right?
AYERS: Of course, the chief usher is an important person and he runs the White House, but after all there was a new President coming in whom he had had nothing to do with I guess before that. I don't know whether he had even met him.
Another interesting development: Before Eisenhower took over, employees who had to go from the East Wing
to the West Wing where the White House offices were, or from the East Wing over to the West Wing, could go directly across through the ground floor of the White House. But that route was shut off so that some of them had to go outside and walk through the grounds and around; they couldn't go through the White House ground floor corridor to get from one side to the other. I don't know whether that changed later after he got settled into the White House or not.
HESS: Did you go up to the Capitol to see the inauguration?
AYERS: You mean the Eisenhower inauguration?
HESS: Yes, Eisenhower inauguration.
AYERS: No. No.
HESS: Okay. Did President Truman ever express himself in your presence, or ever express in your presence any viewpoint about the operation of the Presidency or on Government organization?
AYERS: Well, I found in looking through some of my notes the other day, a little something. I don't know whether this fits in as a part of that or not, and it's probably all in the records anyway. But back in, I think it was l947--he had been in a couple of years then--he received the members of the Association of Radio News Analysts. That was just in his office, and it was just that one group. And he was answering questions, and I found that
I had quite a little that he said at that time. Now I thought that may have been--maybe the stenographer did it, and it may all be In his file. I don't know whether it is or not. I noticed who some of them were that were there at that time. Some you wouldn't remember, but among them were the late Elmer Davis; Bill Henry, who died a few months ago in California; Bill Hiliman, who later worked with him, and who has since died; and then John Daly and Ernest K. Lindley, Eric Sevareid, Robert Shaw and Lowell Thomas. You remember H. V. Kaltenborn? He was another who was there.
AYERS: There was a good story about Kaltenborn along about that time. Kaltenborn had a morning newscast and it was pretty early in the morning and he didn't like it too much--thought he was kind of being shoved out. He was getting along in years. He complained to one of the top ones in the network here in Washington about it, who told me about it later. He said, "You know, Kaltenborn came to me, and he didn't like those early hours and wanted me to pick some better hours for his broadcast."
I said, 'You know don't you that the President listens to you every morning?'
"Well," he said, "I didn't have any more trouble
Well, Kaltenborn raised some questions at this meeting about the Greek-Turkish Aid program and this led to what the President said at that time. I don't know whether you want any of it.
HESS: All right.
AYERS: Do you?
AYERS: Well, the President said that internal construction and restoration to a peacetime economy was what he was principally interested in, on a free basis. And then he said this: "You know, there are differences in definition of the word democracy, and our definition doesn't work all the way around the world. It's a much misused word anyway," he said, "to begin with. And our Government is not a democracy, thank God, it's a republic. We elect men to use their best judgment to the public interest. You get that sort of legislature and you get that sort of President, and you have a republic that will work in the public interest. Democracy is a term. And there is only one place in the world where there is any democracy and that's in the New England Town Meeting."
I don't know whether, as I say, whether this is in the records anywhere or not; I think it must be.
Somebody must have made a record of it at the time.
I don't think that that's all mine. I must have gotten it, probably, from the White House stenographer. He probably took it so that we'd have something to give out to the press if we wanted to.
The President went on to say something that I think is rather interesting in view of the present situation that we're going through in this country today. He said, "The radio I have always been afraid would restore the Greek approach to the demagogues' ability to mislead the country. I hope it will never come about, the man with a sweet voice and great personality, where he could do things to this country if he could control the air." Don't you think that is just about what he might be saying today? And that was said twenty-three years ago. I think that shows a little of his viewpoint and that he wasn't so far behind today's times.
He said, "My idea of the restoration of a peacetime economy in these countries,"--that's talking about the Greek-Turkish Aid--"with the hope that they will sometime themselves inaugurate a free government that will be for the benefit of the people. That's the principal thing that we have to do." He said, "There isn't any difference in the totalitarian states, I don't care what you call
them. You call them Nazis, Communists, Fascists, Franco, or anything else, they are all alike." He said, "It is not our intention to tell any country what its internal business should be or how its internal business should be handled. We are hopeful that that internal business would be along lines most beneficial to the individual. I believe in the Bill of Rights. I think that's the most important part of our Constitution. The right of the individual to go where he pleases, think what he pleases, so long as he's not materially injuring his neighbors."
There's considerably more to what he said at that time, but--at one time--not that time--one time in reference to the so-called Truman Doctrine, and he didn't like the use of that phrase . .
HESS: Is that right?
HESS: You heard him say that?
AYERS: He didn't want it to be called the Truman Doctrine.
He said, "All I'm interested in is the doctrine of the Republic of the United States of America, to restore free government in the world, to make the United Nations work in the manner in which the colonies made the Federal Government work."
Now that, I think, sort of answers your question, partly at least, as to what he thought about what the Government should do. I don't know that he talked about it so specifically anywhere that I have any notes on.
That does not mean that he did not comment or express views on many of these things that you have asked about. Besides staff meetings and gatherings of which there is no record and with no certain recollection of them. Now I held many conversations, some brief and some quite lengthy but informal and with a variety of subjects discussed. Of some of these I made and retained notes, some more complete and detailed than others.
Late in 1951, for instance, we had one conversation during which the discussion ranged rather widely. This led to the effect of positions in the government upon some individuals, the development of what we termed "Potomac Fever." The President commented that some men
come into the government at the top without having risen through the ranks and without any experience in politics or government. That, he said, was the case of Henry Wallace whom President Roosevelt brought into government as a Cabinet officer, although he had had no experience in governmental affairs. This also was true, he said, of Henry Morgenthau, whom Roosevelt made Secretary of the Treasury. Speaking particularly of "Potomac Fever" the President said most of the Presidents of the past had experiences with this in the case of some of their subordinates, and he mentioned Lincoln's troubles with [William Henry] Seward.
The President commented that Congress was always trying to invade the executive power of the President and he said that no President ever lost anything in a fight with the Congress.
On one occasion, at a staff meeting, he outlined the duties of the members of his staff--what he wanted them to do. Matt Connelly was to handle appointments; Charlie Ross, all press matters; Bill Hassett, correspondence; the Military and Naval aides, matters within these services; and Judge Vinson and Sam Rosenman, such special matters as might be assigned to them. And it was then in June, I think; it was only a couple of months after he came in. He said that he wanted Fred
Vinson, who was then the Director of Mobilization and Reconversion.
HESS: Yes. Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion.
AYERS: The President wanted him to sit in on these morning staff conferences and Vinson did. That's when I came to know Vinson and we became very good friends.
HESS: Wasn't too long after that when he went to the Treasury Department was it?
AYERS: No it wasn't, but Vinson was--I always thought--one of the most valuable men in those staff meetings, and in the work he did. He had an amazing capacity for anything that might be handed over to him. He could come in there in the morning and have all the statistics or details about whatever it might be. Say it was a coal situation, or anything, he could sit there and when his turn came, the thing could be brought up and he could lay it out plainly and clearly.
HESS: When did you first meet Judge Vinson? Do you recall when you first saw him?
AYERS: No, I can't recall just when I first met him.
HESS: Now after he left the Office of War Mobilization and Reconversion he went over to the Treasury for a little while . .
AYERS: As Secretary of the Treasury.
HESS: Secretary of the Treasury and then he went to the Supreme Court.
AYERS: As Chief Justice of the United States.
HESS: That's right. Did he visit the White House often? Did you see him around the White House very often?
AYERS: No I don't think so. He may have come over now and then; I don't know about that. I know that when he was Chief Justice he went down to Key West on one trip when I did. I did not go down when the President did but I was to go down later. I don't know how long the President had been down when I was to go. Anyhow, I was to fly down on the President's plane and I did now know who else, if anyone, was to go at that time. A White House car was to come after me to take me to the airport but the chauffeur got the wrong address and was delayed so that by the time I finally got the car it was nearly time to take off. The result was a fast ride to the airport where the President's plane was waiting. I hurried to get aboard and found the Chief Justice aboard and waiting. There was a third passenger, Congressman Smathers of Florida who, apparently, was more or less of a hitchhiker for the ride down. The Chief Justice had a package which he was carefully carrying. It was a beautiful cake which Mrs. Vinson had baked for the President.
We carefully put it on a divan or sofa in the President's compartment where he and I sat on the way down. We talked baseball, I recall, because you know he played semi-pro ball when he was a young fellow. And we were about the same age, pretty nearly the same age, and both knew the same baseball names and had the same heroes of that era. So we had a pleasant trip down and I think I got better acquainted and from then on we were always good friends. I always thought a great deal of him.
HESS: In 1952 there was some discussion that Mr. Truman would have liked for Judge Vinson to have been the Democratic standard-bearer for the Party that year. Did you ever hear anything on that?
AYERS: I don't think I ever did. I might have, if there had been some gossip around or something. I don't believe anybody ever took it very seriously. I do know we had some discussions from time to time, something about the campaign that was coming up, that '52 one.
HESS: What do you have?
AYERS: I had several talks with the President over the months before the 1952 election, during which the political situation was discussed. One of which I found some notes was more than a year previous during which Eisenhower's
name was brought up. The President expressed a high regard for the General as a man and soldier, but he pointed out that education for a military career did not equip a man for the Presidency. Mr. Truman cited General Grant and his experiences as President. The President agreed Eisenhower must be smart enough to know that but that there was one thing that might make him willing to be a candidate, and that would be if MacArthur were to run and Eisenhower would oppose him, because he said Eisenhower hated MacArthur as much as anyone. The President, however, did not indicate any knowledge of Eisenhower's intentions, but I gained the impression he did not seriously believe at that time that the General would be a candidate.
Only a few days later I took in to the President a magazine containing an article predicting the President would be a candidate for re-election and would be reelected. Prompted by this, the President said that the first thing Mrs. Truman said when she got back to Blair House a few days previously on her return from Kansas City where she had spent the summer, was to ask the President about all she had been reading about him and re-election. He went on to say that she was concerned not so much about whether he would be re-elected or not,
but the effect of it upon their daughter, and upon him if he had to serve another term. I said I did not know whether he cared what I thought or not but he said he did and I told him I felt that for his own sake it was too bad if he had to run again. He said he asked Mrs. Truman if she had a candidate and she said, "No." Then he said the needs of the country came first and "you know" what it would mean to have Taft or someone like him elected--the country would go back years, it would put labor back where it was years ago, there would be a bank depression, etc. He said that while Eisenhower was a fine man, he did not believe he would be a good President, but at least he would not change the foreign policy, whereas Taft would shoot it to pieces. He said no man, obviously having himself in mind, should think he was the whole country, but he had to keep in mind the welfare of the country. He said, "I have a terrible decision to make," and I said I did not envy him having it but that I felt sure he would make the right one.
Of course, we had many talks in the following weeks and months, some very brief, others of some length, and there probably were other political references which I do not recall or have at hand any notes of until the situation began to warm up with the approach of primaries
leading up to the 1952 election. During one of these talks, in the spring, he said he'd probably have more time to consider some things after Congress adjourned. I pointed out that a political campaign was coming up and he said, "Yes, and I wish I had kept my mouth shut about it." I don't recall specifically what he had in mind, but he added that he was afraid if [Estes] Kefauver got the Democratic presidential nomination he would have a hard time putting his whole heart into it.
I asked the President if he thought Kefauver would get the nomination and he expressed doubt of it although he said the Senator might have the most votes on the first ballot at the national convention, although Senator Russell might have the most if Kerr [Senator Robert Kerr, Oklahoma] would throw in with him. He said [Averell] Harriman probably would have 200 or so votes and then the favorite sons would have some---[Hubert] Humphrey, [Alben] Barkley, and McMahon [Connecticut]. I asked him how about Adlai Stevenson [Governor, Illinois] and the President expressed some impatience over Stevenson's attitude. He said he thought Stevenson was too much concerned about the Chicago Tribune. I said that it seemed to me that all the politicians of Illinois, both Democrats and Republicans, were always too concerned
about the Tribune. A lot of people read the paper but its influence was not so great. And the President then cited his own case. You remember that Chicago Tribune when he was re-elected?
AYERS: And then he spoke of some of the other papers, you know, the Kansas City Star, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, and the Hearst papers, which he said failed to exercise any actual influence of any importance on the voters. He said that. I told him I thought there were some cases of newspapers which carried some influence with some types of readers, and I mentioned particularly the New York Times. I thought it did have some influence with its editorials on certain of its readers, probably none upon the mass of voters. The President said the Times tried to get, and present accurately, all the news and the people read it for that purpose, but that very few of them read the editorials. It was always his theory--he was always stating it, even I think in news conferences on occasion--that if the people have the facts honestly and accurately they will do all right, but that so many papers such as the Chicago Tribune even colored the facts.
When I saw him after his return from Kansas City, following the election, he talked about the outcome and
said he had been thinking about the whole thing--the election and the result--and that he had concluded that maybe it was a good thing. He said many people in this country did not know what it was to have the Republicans in control and that perhaps it would be well for them to experience it. He expressed the idea that it might be a good thing for some people (I had mentioned the younger generation whose memory did not go back twenty years) to learn for themselves what President Roosevelt and he had been trying to do. With the Republicans in control he predicted that those people would have no one in Washington to represent them and work for them, and he pointed out what they might expect from those in power. He predicted they would turn over the oil in the submerged lands off the coast to the private oil interests and the public power to private power companies. In the Senate, practically even with Wayne Morse of Oregon, as a Democrat, he said the good men, like Morse and [Leverett] Saltonstall, Republican of Massachusetts would be balanced out by Byrd of Virginia arid men of that type. And pre-siding over the Senate, he said would be the new Vice President [Richard] Nixon, whom he termed a "crook."
You know, I was going to talk a little, but what I was going to say doesn't have too much relationship to
anything specifically here, but I did want to say something about the President and the press. I don't think we've done very much on that, have we?
HESS: Not very much.
AYERS: Well, I don't want to do very much now. But I've been thinking about all this to-do over [Spiro] Agnew, what he's been saying about the press, and all that. And of course, I suppose I am biased, having been a newspaperman for years, but I see some of the faults of the press as well as anybody else. But you know, it's been more or less of an axiom I think with newspapermen that everybody knows how to run a newspaper better than the men who run it. It's a fact, and that is because everybody reads a newspaper or sees a newspaper, I think. And I don't suppose there's been hardly a President, or public official, who couldn't run every paper better than the editor runs it, or thinks he could. Now Franklin Roosevelt probably knew newspapers better than a great many did, but I think he felt that he knew more about how the papers ought to be run than the people who ran them. And I think that was true with most of them and I think probably to some degree with Truman. They always could criticize, but I don't think they could always actually do it if they had to.
HESS: Mr. Truman used to think that the owners and the publishers were a little too conservative, did he not? He thought that he got along quite well with the reporters.
AYERS: Oh yes, yes.
HESS: Well, that seems like .
AYERS: That follows the thought that I just gave you there that--and he said it more than once--he didn't care what they said editorially, as long as the news reporter did an honest job, you didn't need to worry about the editorials. And I think he's right about it. I think you could see it in--if you follow the figures, circulation figures in the campaign, especially in those campaigns in which he participated and some since--that you'd find that the vast majority, in his campaign at least, the vast majority of the papers, and the majority in the sense of circulation, were against him editorially. On the other hand, most of the reporters, I guess, probably voted for him.
HESS: What newsmen covering the White House seemed to get along with, or seemed to have the President's special favor?
AYERS: I don't think anybody, unless perhaps Tony [Ernest B.] Vaccaro because he had known him. He was an Associated
Press man and he had covered the Senate and knew him.
HESS: Knew him from the Senate days.
AYERS: Senate days. Whether there are any others up there, I don't know any that he was very favorable to. There was one thing about it that some of the people that came in with President Truman didn't realize, that there's a great difference between the Presidency and other positions in public life. If the President says anything, it's news, almost anything. And people close to him, if they talk out of turn, they're apt to set something going. And a little of that happened as you may have read, with President Truman, not so much him personally, as with--well, Harry Vaughan, General Vaughan, for instance, who didn't realize when he said s